The Current Thinking Styles and it's Relationship between Psychology of Optimism, Pessimism for Second Secondary School Students in Jenin Governorate

The Current Thinking Styles and it's Relationship between Psychology of Optimism, Pessimism for Second Secondary School Students in Jenin Governorate PDF

Nawaal Khalid Hassan Nassrallah

Supervisor(s)

Dr. Abed Assaf - د. صلاح ياسين

Discussion Commity

170 صفحة

Abstract :

Abstract this study aims at recognize the relationship between current thinking styles and psychology of optimism, pessimism of second secondary school students in Jenin governorate, moreover. To achieve study objectives, the researcher selected a sample of second secondary students in Jenin governorate, a (281) student (female and male) with a percent of (9.4%) of the original society. The sample was selected by the stratified random method .For the purpose of the study, the researcher used two questionnaires; Harrison & Barsson questionnaire for thinking styles, and Seaman optimism and pessimism questionnaire. The study adopted and tested the validity of null hypothesis: -Current Thinking Styles is (Synthesis Thinking, Idealistic Thinking Pragmatic Thinking, Analytic Thinking Analytic Thinking).and There are relation on the level (α=0.05) between current thinking styles and psychology of optimism, pessimism for second secondary school students in Jenin governorate. The study data was collected and analyzed, the following results were found. -The rang of the Optimism, Pessimism for Second Secondary School Students in Jenin Governorate is(21.231) and this is Pessimism behavior . -There are differences statistically significant on the level (α=0.05) between current thinking styles and psychology of optimism, pessimism for second secondary school students in Jenin governorate; and to know the most common thinking style, Sidak post Hoc test was used. - There are no differences on the level (α=0.05) between current thinking styles used by second secondary school students in Jenin governorate; due to the variable of gender. - There are no differences on the level (α=0.05) between current thinking styles used by second secondary school students in Jenin governorate; due to the variable of gender. - There are no differences on the level (α=0.05) between current thinking styles used by second secondary school students in Jenin governorate; due to the variable of place of accommodation. - There are no differences the level (α=0.05) between current thinking styles used by second secondary school students in Jenin governorate; due to the variable of due to student major( literary, scientific). - There are no the level (α=0.05) between current thinking styles used by second secondary school students in Jenin governorate; due to the variable of score in first secondary classes. There are no differences the level (α=0.05) between means of student responses on psychology of optimism, pessimism questionnaire due to the variable of for gender; differences lean toward males; which means males are more optimistic than females. There are no differences the level (α=0.05) between means of student responses on psychology of optimism, pessimism questionnaire due to the variable of place of accommodation. - There are no differences on the level (α=0.05) between means of student responses on psychology of optimism, pessimism questionnaire due to the variable of student major (literary, scientific). - There are differences on the level (α=0.05) between means of student responses on psychology of optimism, pessimism questionnaire due to the variable of student score; the differences lean to (69-60), (80-89), and (90 and more), the differences were in favor of (70-79) and (90-and more). - There are no relation on the level (α=0.05) between thinking styles and optimism, pessimism psychology for second secondary students in Jenin governorate.

Full Article